M. I. Ryabov, A. L. Sukharev, M. I. Orlyuk, L. I. Sobitnyak, A. A. Romenets


PACS number: 94.30.Ms

Purpose: The main oscillation periods of the geomagnetic field perturbation level in the Odesa magnetic anomaly area are studied by the data observed at the “Odesa” geomagnetic observatory within the 24th solar activity cycle. The work is purposed to search for distinctions and similarity in manifestation and properties of short-term and long-term geomagnetic quasi-periodical variations under the conditions of anomalous, at the “Odesa” geomagnetic observatory, and poorly anomalous, at the “Kyiv” geomagnetic observatory, geomagnetic fields.

Design methodology/approach: The data of high-time resolution digital magnetometers were used. Search for the fluctuation periods was made by the rapid continuous wavelet transform and the short-term Fourier transform (STFT). For the selection and subsequent separate analysis of fluctuations corresponding to different periods and spectral regions, the band-pass Fourier filtering was used.

Findings: The change of periods of solar diurnal variations of geomagnetic field (24, 12, 8, 6 h) during the magnetic storms is determined. The shortest periods, 2 h and less, showed up in the “Odesa” geomagnetic observatory data. By the observations in the “Odesa” observatory, the increase of amplitude of short periods (4-5 h)  with time during 2008–2013 has been marked. The variations with periods 6, 8 h react upon geomagnetic disturbances by the smooth increase of amplitude. Periods 4-5 h are recorded during strong magnetic storms, and weak variations with periods less than 4 h often appear during weak magnetic storms. Period about 27 days prevails in the “Kyiv” geomagnetic observatory data, and that of about 37 days – in the “Odesa” geomagnetic observatory data. The changes of amplitude of solar diurnal variations of geomagnetic field during 2015 by the “Odesa” observatory data are determined for the subsequent comparing to the solar activity behavior.

Conclusions: Generalization of results shows differences in behavior of the basic periods of geomagnetic activity in the Odesa magnetic anomaly area (the “Odesa” observatory) and under the conditions of the poorly anomalous geomagnetic field (the “Kyiv” observatory). At the “Odesa” observatory, the short periods show up more noticeably, less than 6 h. At the “Kyiv” observatory, the long duration periods prevail (from a few days up to a few tens of days).

Key words: space weather, solar activity, geomagnetic field, magnetic storms, solar diurnal variations, magnetic anomaly, magnetosphere, ionosphere, wavelet analysis

 Manuscript submitted  26.01.2019

Radio phys. radio astron. 2019, 24(1): 68-79


1. ORLYUK, M. I., MARCHENKO, A. V. and IVASHCHENKO, I. N., 2014 Calculating of the Geomagnetic Field Induction Vector Components on the Odessa Magnetic Anomaly Region. Geodinamika. vol. 1, is. 16, pp. 96–102. (in Russian).

2. MARCHENKO, A. and ORLYUK, M., 2010. 3D magnetic model of the East European Craton and its effect at near-surface and satellite heights. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal. vol. 32, is. 4. pp. 96–98.

3. ORLYUK, M. I. and ROMENETS, A. A., 2011. The Structure and Dinamics of the Main Magnetic Field of the Earth on its Surface and in the Near Space. Odessa Astronomical Publications. vol. 24, pp. 124–128. (in Russian).

4. AMINATOV, A. S., ZAITZEV, A. N., ODINTSOV, V. I. and PETROV, V. G., 2001. Earth’s magnetic field variations: the magnetic observatories data for period 1984–2001 on CD-ROM. Moscow, Russia: IZMIRAN Publ. (in Russian).

5. ORLIUK, M. I., ROMENETS, A. A., SUMARUK, T. P. and SUMARUK, YU. P., 2012. Geomagnetic field of Ukraine: estimation of internal and external sources contribution. Odessa Astronomical Publications. vol. 25, is. 2, pp. 102–108. DOI: 10.18524/1810-4215.2012.25.83326

6. ORLYUK, M. I., ROMENETS, A. A., SUMARUK, P. V., SUMARUK, YU. P. and SUMARUK, T. P., 2012. The spatial-temporal structure of the magnetic field of Ukraine’s territory: assessment of the contribution of internal and external sources. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal. Vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 137–144. (in Russian). DOI: 10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v34i3.2012.116651

7. GUGLIA, L. I., ORLYUK, M. I., RYABOV, M. I., SUKHAREV, A. L. and ORLIUK, I. M. 2013. Daily and short-period changes dynamics of the Earth’s magnetic field in the 24-th cycle of solar activity according to magnetic observatory “Odessa”. Odessa astronomical publications. vol. 26, is. 2, pp. 263–268.

8. NEWBERY, A. C. R., 1970. Trigonometric interpolation and curve-fitting. Math. Comput. vol. 24, is. 112, pp. 869–876. DOI:

9. AKIMA, H., 1970. A New Method of Interpolation and Smooth Curve Fitting Based on Local Procedures. J. ACM. vol. 17, is. 4, pp. 589–602. DOI:

10. BÜSSOW, R., 2007. An algorithm for the continuous Morlet wavelet transform. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. vol. 21, is. 8, pp. 2970–2979. DOI:

11. ZAKOWSKI, K., 2007. Detection and time/frequency analysis of electric fields in the ground. Anti-Corros. Meth. Mater. vol. 54, is. 5, pp. 294–300. DOI: 10.1108/ 00035590710822143

12. BLINCHIKOFF, H. J. and ZVEREV, A. I., 2001. Filtering in the Time and Frequency Domains. Raleigh, NC, USA: SciTech Publishing, Ink. DOI:

13. FADEEV, B. V. and MISHIN, V. M., 1985. Mid-latitude ionospheric winds and generation of Sq-like electric field and currents. Issledovaniya po Geomagnetizmu, Aeronomii i Fizike Solntsa. [Research on Geomagnetism, Aeronomy, and Solar Physics.] Moscow, Russia: Nauka Publ. Vol 74, pp. 162–170. (in Russian).

14. OBRIDKO, V. N., KANONIDI, K. D., MITROFANOV, T. A. and SHELTING, B. D., 2013. Solar activity and geomagnetic disturbances. Geomag. Aeron. vol. 53, is. 2, pp. 147–156.

15. GERMANOVICH, O., LIFERENKO, V. and LEBEDEV, S., 2012. Hilbert transform algorithm in LabView. Komponenty I Tekhnologii. [Components and Technologies]. is. 2, pp.122–124. (in Russian).

16. THAYER, J. P., LEI, J., FORBES, J. M., SUTTON, E. K. and NEREM, R. S., 2008. Thermospheric density oscillations due to periodic solar wind high-speed streams. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. vol. 113, is. A6, id. A06307. DOI:

17. KILCIK, A., OZGUC, A., YURCHYSHYN, V. and ROZELOT, J. P., 2014. Sunspot Count Periodicities in Different Zurich Sunspot Group Classes Since 1986. Sol. Phys. vol. 289, is. 11, pp. 4365–4376. DOI: 10.1007/s11207- 014-0580-0

18. PRABHAKARAN NAYAR, S. R., ALEXANDER, L. T., RADHIKA, V. N., JOHN, T., SUBRAHMANYAM, P., CHOPRA, P., BAHL, M., MAINI, H. K., SINGH, V., SINGH, D. and GARG, S. C., 2004. Observation of periodic fluctuations in electron and ion temperatures at the low-latitude upper ionosphere by SROSS-C2 satellite. Ann. Geophys. vol. 22, is. 5, pp. 1665–1674. DOI: 10.5194/ angeo-22-1665-200

19. GAIDYSHEV, I., 2001. Data analysis and processing: Special handbook. Saint Peterburg, Russia: Piter Publ. (in Russian).

20. PAP, J., TOBISKA, W. K. and BOUWER, S. D., 1990. Periodicities of solar irradiance and solar activity indices, I. Sol. Phys. vol. 129, is. 1, pp. 165–189. DOI: 10.1007/BF00154372

21. BOUWER, S. D., 1992. Periodicities of solar irradiance and solar activity indices, II. Sol. Phys. vol. 142, is. 2, pp. 365–389. DOI:

22. PRABHAKARAN NAYAR, S. R., 2006. Periodicities in solar activity and their signature in the terrestrial environment. In: ILWS Workshop Proceedings. Goa, India, February 19-24, 2006. pp. 170–177.

23. CHAKRABARTY, D., BAGIYA, M. S., THAMPI, S. V. and IYER, K. N., 2012. Solar EUV flux (0.1-50 nm), F10.7 cm flux, sunspot number and the total electron content in the crest region of equatorial ionization anomaly during the deep minimum between solar cycle 23 and 24. Indian J. Radio Space Phys. vol. 41, pp. 110–120.

24. MITCHELL, N. J., MIDDLETON, H. R., BEARD, A. G., WILLIAMS, P. J. S. and MULLER, H. G., 1999. The 16-day planetary wave in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere. Ann. Geophys. vol. 17, is. 11, pp. 1447–1456. DOI:

25. HOFFMANN, P. and JACOBI, C., 2006. Analysis of planetary waves seen in ionospheric total electron content (TEC) perturbations. Wiss. Mitteil. Inst. f. Meteorol. Univ. Leipzig. vol. 37, pp. 29–39.

26. KOHSIEK, A., GLASSMEIER, K. H. and HIROOKA, T., 1995. Periods of planetary waves in geomagnetic variations. Ann. Geophys. vol. 13, is. 2, pp. 168–176. DOI:

27. ALTADILL, D. and APOSTOLOV, E. M., 2003. Time and scale size of planetary wave signatures in the ionospheric F region: Role of the geomagnetic activity and mesosphere/lower thermosphere winds. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. vol. 108, is. A11, id. 1403. DOI:


space weather; solar activity; geomagnetic field; magnetic storms; solar diurnal variations; magnetic anomaly; magnetosphere; ionosphere; wavelet analysis

Full Text:


Creative Commons License

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) .